http://horts.in/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Comparision_of_GS_ModelsComparision of GS Models - Revision history2026-05-07T15:06:29ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.37.2http://horts.in/index.php?title=Comparision_of_GS_Models&diff=878&oldid=prevRaj: 1 revision imported2016-06-23T08:39:07Z<p>1 revision imported</p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="1" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="1" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 14:09, 23 June 2016</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-notice" lang="en"><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div>
</td></tr></table>Rajhttp://horts.in/index.php?title=Comparision_of_GS_Models&diff=877&oldid=prevRaj at 11:46, 27 May 20162016-05-27T11:46:25Z<p></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>[[Category:Readings]] [[Category:Rajkumar]] [[Category:Biology]]<br />
== The scope == <br />
* Various GS models such as Bayes B, SPLS, BL, RR_BLUP, PLS have been compared<ref>[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4592981 Comparison of Genomic Selection Models to Predict Flowering Time and Spike Grain Number in Two Hexaploid Wheat Doubled Haploid Populations]</ref><br />
* Prediction accuracy in Time to young microspore: '''0.5 to 0.84'''<br />
* Prediction accuracy of grain number under Osmatic stress conditions : '''0.27 - 0.46''' <br />
* Prediction accuracy of grain number under controlled conditions : '''0.1 - 0.42'''<br />
* Accuracies were generally lower in independent validation than cross validation (?!)<br />
* BayesB and SPLS were turned out to be the best models<br />
* Hence BayesB and SPLS capture the LD between the markers and traits => higher accuracy.<br />
* Excluding markers from QTL mapping reduces the accuracies (?!)<br />
==</div>Raj